Friday, September 5, 2008

Clearing things up

I have had a couple of dear brothers express concern that I might be going too far in my analysis of Sarah Palin’s nomination; so out of respect for them and the wisdom they have provided let me make a few things clear: You need to know that these posts do not constitute the official church position of Covenant of Grace. I am also not trying to tell people how they need to vote—your conscience must be your guide (the principles of liberty and charity must be upheld). However I am trying to faithfully exercise my calling as a preacher and teacher of God's word (you won’t however hear me comment on the presidential election from the pulpit—that time is reserved for the exposition of Scripture). But as a preacher and teacher I believe that I have a duty to speak up and provide biblical answers to the questions of the day; Luther once said that if we do not speak to the issues facing us we are not being faithful. Sometimes I may say things that are unpopular and controversial – I am not trying to stir up dissension; I’m interested in the church being a light in this culture and that is going to require doing some hard work and asking some hard questions. And finally I understand that I may be wrong, you need to know that these posts are presented in humility and godly fear.

All of that brings me back around to the principle question I have been asked by these men; is this a biblical issue? I believe that it is. When I read Scripture I see that God has ordered society a certain way; this order was not coincidental, but a part of God’s design. I also see that our responsibility as Christians is to hold to this design and pass it on to future generations. There are a number of passages that I believe confirm this truth but let me just highlight one. Paul tells Titus:

“Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, so that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored.”

This passage certainly seems to teach that God wants woman to be workers at home; loving and submitting to their own husband and loving their children. The consequence tied to this passage is profound; that the word of God will not be dishonored. I know that there are certain circumstances that require women to work outside the home and I do not believe that these women are sinning in doing so. But I don’t think that is the case with Sarah Palin – she is not doing this out of necessity but by choice. We have to admit that that the office of Vice President is both important and time consuming—I believe it is naive to assume that this won’t affect her ability mother her children.

My primary concern however is with the overwhelmingly enthusiastic evangelical response to her nomination. This seems to be an indication that we in the church don't understand or affirm this basic design and are drifting further and further from the biblical standard as articulated in passages such as Titus 2:3-5. Not only that we don’t seem to know that we are drifting. This is why I believe it is a biblical issue that is too important to be ignored. I understand that many are voting for McCain/Palin because of their desire to vote for a pro-life ticket that has a chance to win. But for me this brings up another issue (I’ve always been a bit inquisitive) isn’t there a deep seeded and unbreakable tie that exists between feminism and abortion? Isn't on demand abortion a consequnce of the feminist movement? To be clear I define feminism as a desire to move away from “traditional” standards. I would see these standards as the ones articulated in passages like Titus 2:3-5. Sarah Palin is a member of a feminist group (albeit a pro-life one) and has shown that she does not feel bound by “traditional” standards; that being the case is it possible to embrace (or even begrudgingly accept) feminism in order to affirm ones commitment to the pro-life movement? Is it possible that this position will eventually crumble under the weight of contradiction?

I firmly believe that it is possible for the church to actually change the world and put an end to the culture of death propagated through abortion, while at the same time affirming God’s design for the home. The great news is that it is something that cannot be deterred or influenced by those in political office. We simply must obey and wait. God will put an end to abortion—in fact one day He will make everything right.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you Dirk for your time and effort in researching and bringing forth God's word relating to this issue. Speaking form my own experiences, it is alway easy to "drift" from God's biblical principles over time and not realize it.

Candace/Chloe said...

Dirk,

You are a courageous and godly man who speaks in love, grace and wisdom. Thank you for expressing your thoughts regarding this highly sensitive issue. I realize that even among the Christian community there will be varying opinions. But hopefully, we can all speak with kindness, grace, and conviction (as you have) as we make our position known.

We, too, see an overwhelming excitement among evangelicals, and have had trouble sharing their enthusiasm. Although, we hadn't planned on voting for McCain even before Palin.

As of now, we're researching(Pastor) Dr. Chuck Baldwin who is running on the Constitution Party ticket.

Anonymous said...

After reading this post and your last post, I am really thinking hard. :)
I hadn't thought about a third party vote, and I definitely don't want to not vote at all. I love the pro-life values Palin offers and to me that made McCain look all the better. I haven't been able to feel peace about her knowing that she is a wife and mother. But then again, the leaders we have voted for in the past weren't always God honoring either.
These posts shed a lot of light on this difficult topic and have encouraged me to look at things more clearly. Thanks

Kristen said...

Dave and I always love hearing your thoughts, and even if I don't always agree point-for-point, I never doubt that your compass is Truth and your motivation the purity of the Gospel and the Church. And of course, I can't help but love opinionated people ;-)

Anonymous said...

I was planning on asking you a "couple" of questions at the head of household meeting on this very subject, but you pretty much cleared a lot of things up for me. This has been on my mind constantly for days and days, never coming to any real conclusions, only truths I couldn't ignore and an uneasiness about this whole situation. I actually got excited about this at first, but then when I applied what I know to be the truth revealed by God in His word, I couldn't remain excited and actually became upset over these conflicting points (feminism, mother away from children, etc.). I never thought about a third party, only because I had been told so many times that they are whacko nutjob groups that don't have any real power or legitimate ideas. I am considering this avenue at this point, even if i'm not popular. I don't answer to man for my vote, I answer to God. I've said it before Dirk, you are a blessing to me. I work making legs etc., you study and expound upon the Word of God in a way that I don't have time to do, I am grateful to have you as my teacher, showing me truths within truths that I didn't realize before. God is really working on our hearts through you, don't doubt it for a minute. Thank you Dirk and praise be to God!

stacey said...

I didn't read all of your post yet (this one) because of kids all around, but I did want to comment on voting for a 3rd party. I think that is dangerous. If pro life people vote for a 3rd party, then it is like throwing away your vote. I hate to say it, but it is true. Has an independent ever won? If pro-lifer's truly believe that life trumps everything else, then shouldn't us pro-lifer's vote for the pro-life side even if we don't agree with all of what that party stands for? I am scared that pro life christians will vote independent and the pro life republican ticket will suffer because of it. That is probably EXACTLY what the democrats would love to see us do.

Candace/Chloe said...

Stacey, I have to respectfully disagree! As Christians, I think we have a responsibility to vote according to how God directs us! If God is not directing our family to vote for a major party, we cannot in good conscience vote for that party. I believe God is in control and I don't believe in the concept of throwing away a vote.

You know as good as anyone that we are staunch pro-lifers, but that is not our only premise for voting. Again, God is in control, and we're trusting in His Will, no matter the outcome.

Amy said...

Wow. Everyone has me thinking now. I was about to post something very like what Stacey said. I still feel strongly that way, but I see what Candace is saying too. Dirk's posts and all these different comments are really conflicting with my present belief system and causing me to evaluate WHY I believe the way I do.